For the benefit of those who may have only recently tuned in :...

For the benefit of those who may have only recently tuned in : IW did not wish ill to all NRZ shareholders. What I actually said was the perceived hubris and arrogance of a few was perfectly obvious, and how such behaviour often leads to investment trouble. You're deliberately extrapolating and miscasting what I said, again, Danharks. It is your right to do so, I guess, but own up to the embellishment.
You know, I think if you actually asked a few people in government departments certain obvious questions, you might learn a few interesting things. They are surprisingly approachable For example, the SA regulator isn't the slightest interested in the commercial flow rates from your PCD testing. Pretty much all they cared about was whether whatever you are doing causes any environmental harm. That's the point of all the monitoring equipment. Pie and others clearly are suggesting otherwise.
CS now seems to be saying that LCK were retaining Dennis Denuto [ or similar] to represent them. Please direct all chitchat about lawyers bills etc. to him. That isn't my point, and never was. Perhaps Googling the fate of Al Capone might be useful? Sometimes it's the little things, you know? You also should realise that all government departments go into caretaker mode at election time, and they take a while to crank up again, particularly after a change to another viewpoint. I think it pretty sure that Environment* were not informed that LCK were 'leaving the room'.