So you've linked to a paper that- in your words- has "fundamental errors" and won't go any further.
Not sure what point you're trying to make here but rest assured, your arguments are going nowhere.
"What would they do to governments and bureaucrats when they realise they've got AIDS from trusting blindly"
And there it is again. What is it, three times now I've asked you to link a paper that shows this and yet- nothing at all. I think it's safe to assume such paper is simply a figment of your over-active imagination.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- NSW - 34 DEAD - 25 fully vaccinated
So you've linked to a paper that- in your words- has...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)