Hi Bizzo. Appreciate your questioning this. I'm no miner, but NTL's says this:
in 2013 NTL commissioned a Pre-Feasibility Study on the Talisman Mine. The Pre-Feasibility Study analysed a range of options around the mining method, materials handling and backup services with a view to identifying the preferred option to establishing a low impact, small-scale underground mining operation. The operation will focus on the high confidence resources, immediately adjacent to the accessible 8 Level drives, delineated during the 2005 exploration program, and create the infrastructure necessary to support further exploration activity. Key findings from the study were:
Mining Method – Ore veins are steeply dipping, from 70° to near vertical, with widths ranging from ~1.0m in the Welcome/Crown area to >6.0m in the Woodstock. Preliminary stope designs were constructed encompassing the volume of estimated payable ore in each resource block. Analysis indicates that the geometry of the lodes is potentially suitable for a number of mining methods. The study recommended that a sub-level stoping design be implemented to provide the flexibility to switch between hand-held and long-hole drilling techniques where applicable.
Materials Handling – An option analysis was carried out on the installation of rail bound transport systems underground compared with the deployment of a fleet of small, rubber tyred loaders and trucks. Results clearly demonstrated that the flexibility of a trackless fleet, which would enable extraction of the resources below 8 Level through a series of small ramp systems, held significant advantage to the project.
Production Plan – A production plan was developed based on the above assumptions. It indicated that an initial five-year operation, with peak production of 35,000 tonnes per annum and 12,000 gold ounces in years 3 and 4 was possible. 65% of the total 106,000 tonnes mined would be derived from the better understood Woodstock and Dubbo Sections. Production planned from the Mystery and Welcome/Crown blocks would primarily comprise on-reef development required to improve and extend the confidence of resource estimates within these areas.
I recall there was also talk about using a "Concentrator" to reduce material handling. Not sure how this fits in or where but perhaps you can comment. Thanks
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NTL - Progress under the Radar - Is it the next Disallowed?
Hi Bizzo. Appreciate your questioning this. I'm no miner, but...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NTL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $10.15M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 29470 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.2¢ | 1000000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 29470 | 0.017 |
1 | 450000 | 0.011 |
2 | 150000 | 0.010 |
1 | 120000 | 0.008 |
1 | 160000 | 0.007 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.022 | 1000000 | 1 |
0.023 | 3141922 | 8 |
0.090 | 25000 | 1 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
0.000 | 0 | 0 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
NTL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable