Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You stated the non nuclear was unviable in one post & then want...

First 117 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Tarvold

20,445 Posts.

1221

20/06/24

11:15

Post #: 74405594
Share

Originally posted by Hingdog: ↑

I'm not advocating anything, I want to see a proper analysis done of the costs of both options. We need baseload power, the cost of doing that with renewables is going to be very high, one only needs to look at the miniscule amount of power that comes from the billions of $$$ we've already spent on batteries to understand that batteries are going to be a horrendously expensive option

Expand

You stated the non nuclear was unviable in one post & then want a 'proper analysis' of costs in the next.
Seems that you've already made your mind up despite well publicised costing already being released.
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Week 26 Wrap: Cerberus of inflation barks – rents, electricity & fuel – and world watches two elders bicker

AVA

Ava Risk Group expands US presence with A$0.7M Substation Deal

LU7

Lithium Universe (ASX:LU7) board visits Quebec to engage key stakeholders

Microcap Wrap: 5 explorers with news out today

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

LRV

Larvotto identifies new exploration target at NSW's Hillgrove, boosting shares by nearly 20%

RCE

Recce's R327 found effective against E.coli during clinical trial

SVL

Silver Mines models five new calderas close to 396Moz Bowdens deposit

CMX

ChemX Materials kicks off first stage works at WA high purity alumina pilot

Wealth Within weighs in on shock 4% inflation read – and stocks that could survive the gloom

There are more pages in this discussion • 265 more messages in this thread...

First 117 Last

SPONSORED BY