"Other studies show that low levels of radiation actually makes...

"Other studies show that low levels of radiation actually makes you more healthy" What nonsense, It is noted that you failed to provide a credible (or even an incredible) link to substantiate this claim.
Radiation exposure has always been around from natural sources like radiation from the ground and from the sun, but humans and other animals have had many generations to adapt to it. Some people are more sensitive than others but medical science tells us that even small doses are cumulative so doctors are reluctant to prescribe too many X-ray or CT scan procedures.Children are more vulnerable to exposure.

https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/health.html

I would prefer that my father's death not be dredged up You did this presumably in an effort to discredit me. You have assumed it was the motivation behind my anti-uranium stance, my involvement in action against the Ben Lomond mine and my posts on this forum. The truth is that my involvement began three years before my father's cancer diagnosis of cancer, the cause of which was almost certainly that of his service at Marling. Although sworn to secrecy, both he and his medical colleagues believed that to be the cause, as did the government, because his hospital cover was picked up by Repatriation.
The Ben Lomond mine is a good example of how dangerous uranium can be, because there had been several incidents (documented by the mine operators) of serious contamination to the waterway during the mining of ore samples and following rain.Yet full mining operations including ore crushing and tailings production had not commenced.The Queensland Government Mining Warden's Court decision in 1981 effectively closed the mine declaring it unsafe on several grounds. The point is there were severe problems even before the mining of uranium began.