Agreed Moosey. I'm all for anything we can do to make nuclear...

Agreed Moosey. I'm all for anything we can do to make nuclear energy safer.

My point is that any sale of enriched uranium or plutonium to a middle east terrorist group for use as a dirty bomb or worse will have a devastating impact on public and politocal support for nuclear energy and by definition our technology and share price.

I'm glad the US caught this guy after he supplied an undercover agent with samples of enriched uranium and plutonium. Now consider where we'd be if he hadn't been intercepted and what if there's more out there in the hads of the Yakuza to be sold on the black market.

If I follow the logic been used here, its like suggesting that the Fukushima had nothing to do with the collapse in the nuclear industry, our share price and the years we've spent in the wilderness limping along on the smell of an oily rag.

As an investor I weigh the risks with the potential rewards and try to avoid confirmation bias.

I'm sure most people would agree that another incident like Fukashima or a dirty bomb would have some impact on public and political support for the nuclear industry as a whole and our project and share price specifically.

Don't get me wrong, I am a significant investor in Silex and believe in its commercial potential, but our technology has not been proven at commercial scale yet and the Paducah plant is still several years way from starting to generate revenues. Any geopolitical shocks right now could derail us and should be factored in by all rational investors in this industry and company.

Enough said. I'll leave it there. We can agree to disagree on this.