The comment by comments by congressman Curtis seem to be talking about the Natrium reactor or any new reactor (Gen4) that runs on runs on Plutonium and is topped up by U238.
https://curtis.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3281
I think that the US would like this LEU now moreso than something that wont be available for two years, not saying the the PLEF would not be part of this new funding, because both GEH and GLE would both help with the US dilema of not having enough Uranium available right now and going forward for enrichment or enough conversion availability right now either for that matter.
If what congressman Curtis said was correct in his bill about reactors using fuel ( that has to be Plutonium) in these advanced reactors then the means there is another bundle available from the UNF and that is RepU, or reprocessed Uranium in the form of LEU and if this Bundle was available to the US right now, which one do you think they will use first? not saying they wont use both though!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Nuclear Power Related Media Thread
The comment by comments by congressman Curtis seem to be talking...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 322 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.54 |
Change
-0.010(0.28%) |
Mkt cap ! $839.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.53 | $3.57 | $3.44 | $1.288M | 367.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 3900 | $3.52 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.54 | 534 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 3900 | 3.520 |
3 | 895 | 3.510 |
3 | 3859 | 3.500 |
6 | 8998 | 3.490 |
3 | 3398 | 3.480 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.540 | 534 | 2 |
3.550 | 342 | 1 |
3.560 | 3097 | 1 |
3.570 | 4317 | 2 |
3.580 | 3492 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 17/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |