Surely all California needs is to multiply the number of batteries right?
1."California's batteries took over gas as the primary source" so lets say conservatively gas was 50% - 2 x the current battery count (CBC)
2. "and, for a few minutes, pumped out 7,046 megawatts of electricity" so lets say conservatively few = 4 - That's 24hr*60min/hr / 4 = 360CBC. 2 x 360 = 720 CBC
3. They will need to charge batteries while others are discharging - so that's 2 x 720 = 1440 CBC
4. Now the allowance for wind and solar output. Assume California capacity factor 0.15 and wind 0.25 - average 0.2. That's 1440 * 5 = 7,200 CBC
5. Now how many days is it possible that there is no wind or sun? Assume it could be as short as a week. Say 7 x 7,200 = 50,400.
So as we can see - California only needs to expand its battery provision by a factor of 50,000, and hope for no more than 1 week of energy capture from sun and wind.
What's the problem?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLX
- Nuclear Power Related Media Thread
SLX
silex systems limited
Add to My Watchlist
5.88%
!
$4.32

Nuclear Power Related Media Thread, page-5251
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$4.32 |
Change
0.240(5.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.028B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.20 | $4.35 | $4.11 | $5.038M | 1.176M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 120 | $4.30 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.34 | 4000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 210 | 4.280 |
1 | 3243 | 4.270 |
1 | 3243 | 4.250 |
1 | 3243 | 4.230 |
1 | 3243 | 4.220 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.340 | 4000 | 1 |
4.350 | 21930 | 6 |
4.360 | 3243 | 1 |
4.380 | 5243 | 2 |
4.400 | 9846 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.11pm 25/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |