Surely all California needs is to multiply the number of batteries right?
1."California's batteries took over gas as the primary source" so lets say conservatively gas was 50% - 2 x the current battery count (CBC)
2. "and, for a few minutes, pumped out 7,046 megawatts of electricity" so lets say conservatively few = 4 - That's 24hr*60min/hr / 4 = 360CBC. 2 x 360 = 720 CBC
3. They will need to charge batteries while others are discharging - so that's 2 x 720 = 1440 CBC
4. Now the allowance for wind and solar output. Assume California capacity factor 0.15 and wind 0.25 - average 0.2. That's 1440 * 5 = 7,200 CBC
5. Now how many days is it possible that there is no wind or sun? Assume it could be as short as a week. Say 7 x 7,200 = 50,400.
So as we can see - California only needs to expand its battery provision by a factor of 50,000, and hope for no more than 1 week of energy capture from sun and wind.
What's the problem?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Nuclear Power Related Media Thread
SLX
silex systems limited
Add to My Watchlist
8.80%
!
$4.08

Surely all California needs is to multiply the number of...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$4.08 |
Change
0.330(8.80%) |
Mkt cap ! $971.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.77 | $4.08 | $3.77 | $3.291M | 828.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 15535 | $4.03 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.10 | 9400 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 15535 | 4.030 |
1 | 3724 | 4.010 |
1 | 1000 | 4.000 |
1 | 3724 | 3.990 |
2 | 4227 | 3.970 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.100 | 9400 | 2 |
4.110 | 200 | 1 |
4.140 | 1000 | 1 |
4.150 | 5000 | 1 |
4.160 | 473 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 24/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |