Surely all California needs is to multiply the number of batteries right?
1."California's batteries took over gas as the primary source" so lets say conservatively gas was 50% - 2 x the current battery count (CBC)
2. "and, for a few minutes, pumped out 7,046 megawatts of electricity" so lets say conservatively few = 4 - That's 24hr*60min/hr / 4 = 360CBC. 2 x 360 = 720 CBC
3. They will need to charge batteries while others are discharging - so that's 2 x 720 = 1440 CBC
4. Now the allowance for wind and solar output. Assume California capacity factor 0.15 and wind 0.25 - average 0.2. That's 1440 * 5 = 7,200 CBC
5. Now how many days is it possible that there is no wind or sun? Assume it could be as short as a week. Say 7 x 7,200 = 50,400.
So as we can see - California only needs to expand its battery provision by a factor of 50,000, and hope for no more than 1 week of energy capture from sun and wind.
What's the problem?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Nuclear Power Related Media Thread
Surely all California needs is to multiply the number of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 200 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$4.50 |
Change
-0.180(3.85%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.067B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.80 | $4.80 | $4.50 | $1.778M | 386.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
11 | 37322 | $4.50 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.51 | 3008 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 36658 | 4.500 |
2 | 1235 | 4.490 |
2 | 15500 | 4.480 |
4 | 690 | 4.470 |
1 | 288 | 4.460 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.530 | 288 | 1 |
4.540 | 288 | 1 |
4.550 | 288 | 1 |
4.560 | 288 | 1 |
4.570 | 288 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |