SLX silex systems limited

Moosey - I can understand that GEH may have had aspirations to...

  1. zog
    3,313 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1071
    Moosey - I can understand that GEH may have had aspirations to sell PRISM to the UK but I cannot find any reference (or reason) that this could/would have extended to GLE (or Silex) being involved in any way with "refining" the RepU which as I understand it only had less than 1% 235U in it with also a significant amount of 236U (~0.5%) also present in that RepU. The resonant v3 frequency for 235U is 15.916 micron but for 236U it's 15,922 microns and at the cryogenic temperatures for separation these frequency band still considerably overlap; consequently I fail to see how our technology could efficiently separate 235U for 236U (it's good for separation of 238U from 235U due to the v3 frequency having a 0.018 microns separation (not 0.006 microns) where the 238U band is significantly attenuated at cryogenic temperatures). For lower atomic number elements (e.g Si) the v3 separation bands are significantly wider but still for zero spin Si (e.g 28Si) in stripping the 29Si we also take out the 30Si (since the v3 frequency is biased towards removing primarily the 29Si but also gets the 30Si (this was alluded to by MG at the 2023 AGM to a question on the topic).

    Maybe you can provide some insight on how the v3 freuency bands for 236U and 235U can be separated (at cryogenic temperatures) to re-enrich RepU (with less than 1% 235U present) possible ignoring the possibility that (with less than 1% 235U) it would be economic. I can understand that reprocessing RepU from spent HALEU (with about 7% 235U present) or spent EBR-II RepU (with about 60% 235U present) could possibly be economic (ONL (and BWTX) currently just downblend this RepU - the 236U is NOT removed).

    I can understand the rational for putting RepU into a fast reactor (where it fission's) but I cannot understand how re-enriching 235U from spent LEU RepU could be economic and also how our technology could do it given the tiny (0.006 micron) separation of the v3 bands and their overlap. maybe you can explain to me where I am wrong (I can understand reprocessing to remove the fission products and higher actinides including Pu - as in the ARC)
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$3.98
Change
-0.030(0.75%)
Mkt cap ! $947.6M
Open High Low Value Volume
$4.14 $4.14 $3.98 $3.352M 829.1K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
6 9796 $3.98
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$4.06 7588 2
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
SLX (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.