The man made climate change philospoghy and the response to it...

The man made climate change philospoghy and the response to it is nothing short of grift via religion.

The planet has been cooling since it formed - it resides in space where the temperature is not much above absoulte zero -273 because degrees celcius. Heat flows from hot to cold due to fundamental principles of thermodynamics and molecular behavior.

The planet still consists of vast volumes of molten rock.

Through volcanic action magma flows to the surface creating land.

Equally, the effect of weather, through erosion, the land goes to the sea.

Eventually the planet will cool to the point life ends, just as there is no life on every other planet we know of.

The quality of human life on earth has improved year on year, exponentially, since the dawn of man - the industrial revolution built on cheap reliable energy being the most accelerated period of all time. Yet now we are governed by imbeciles (I am being kind) who want to destroy us through removal of such, and may I add, destroy the natural environment in doing so by implementing less dense energy sources instead of more dense energy sources (Hi Chis Bowen, and a shout out to Spain)

We now are faced with climate catastophists of two types. The founders of the climate religion and the sheep who follow blindly. The former are grifters who we see flying around in private jets to attend climate rallies, or sucking our tax dollars into wind and solar farms and batteries for their personal gain. The latter have been conned out of their collective minds (Hi Sewie) into believeing they have the power to reverse the climate (reminds me of Christopher Reeve's Superman where he reversed the rotation of the earth - aka fantasy).

The most staggering thing of all is that a warm planet is a good is livable planet, so if you think humanity has warmed the planet you should be thankful not trying to stop it. Besides who's to say what the ideal temperature is? It's hot in the desert and cold in the mountains. Hot at the equator, cold at the poles.

As the master himself said




Now pollution is another story. The net pollution from nuclear far dwarves that from renewabes when one looks at the lifecycle.

Energy density says it all.

The immense wasteful burning of diesel fuel on mining, shipping, processing, manufacturing, installing, and disposal. Renewables do not produce enough energy to perpertuate their replacement. So then we need to burn more diesel fuel to replace them.

First we need 100x the resouces for the same output, then we need to replace them 5 times as often as a NPP.

Then, extraordinarily there is this incredible expectation that we can survive off batteries. FFS.

From Mining Atoms on Substack






Hence my epectation from decades ago that nuclear would one day be the primary source of energy for the world.

We are seeing it happen globally, just not in "the clever country" .... yet.

Sadly it appears that the lying tax thief will be reinstated this weekend, so we can all look forward to taking another few steps towards energy poverty, matched with Tax on unrealised capital gains including our primary place of residence.

Gen Z will not know what's hit them when that happens.

Bring on TR6