Nuclear Power Related Media Thread, page-824

I agree, but when I try to consider the alternatives for the US to fuel the nuclear revival by 2030 I can't. Centrus? No too dear and uncompetitive, it's defence, initial and supplimentry supply only. Urenco?, sure but same problem without defence use and even the extra jobs .
Silex? Can they prove the full scale lasers and get them in to the test loop? I don't know, maybe that's a question for MG to address. How does the technology sit at the moment? I get the aligning of development with the market recovery to conserve cash, and we'll done, but it costs nothing to let the shareholders know how the technology is progressing and if there has been any further "headwinds" in lucas heights or Wilmington.

A bit more info may help serious investors at the expense of players who feed off uncertainty to jerk the share price up and down