Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-22

First 22 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
BCCanuck

4,862 Posts.

16

22/05/24

13:42

Post #: 73954739
Share

Originally posted by johngalt815: ↑

Peter Dutton’s nuclear energy plans have suffered a setback with the CSIRO estimating the nation’s first large-scale nuclear power plant could cost as much as $17 billion, and would not be operational until at least 2040.

With the Coalition now saying it will announce its nuclear plans by the end of the year, the CSIRO’s final annual GenCost report says the electricity would still cost one-and-a-half to twice as much as firmed renewable energy.

https://www.copyright link/politics/federal/nuclear-to-cost-17b-and-take-until-2040-to-build-csiro-20240521-p5jfaj

Expand

"Nuclear to cost $17b" but still cheaper than Snowy 2.0.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Revolutionary inverter technology leads the clean energy charge

TNC

True North increases silver metal at QLD's Vero deposit by 20%

NEU

Neuren Pharmaceuticals dips after pediatric Angelman Syndrome Phase 2 trial results fail to impress

Week 32 Wrap: AI is clearly overhyped – but did we see ‘bubble’ burst already? Plus RBA decision; Japan’s wild week & Google ruling

TKM

Trek Metals jumps 5% as gold & REE drill run kicks off at Christmas Creek in the Kimberley

HZR

Hazer Group reports ten days of continuous operation at graphite-manufacturing test facility

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: picking resilient stocks in a volatile global market

Bitcoin: Current State of Play & Where to Next | Swyftx

Emerald & Azure score Digger & Dealer awards

From the Floor with Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton at Diggers & Dealers 2024

There are more pages in this discussion • 207 more messages in this thread...

First 22 Last