Doesn’t matter what it costs if it provides 24/7 power for at least 50 years.
Zero carbon to worry the lovelies.
No wind turbine blades to have to bury after 15 years.
No solar panels to dispose of after 20 years.
No need for massive transmission lines destroying farmland to go ahead. They utilise existing infrastructure.
Snowy will cost 20 billion if it is ever completed. Which I seriously doubt.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy
Doesn’t matter what it costs if it provides 24/7 power for at...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 49 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Matthew Kowal / Andy Burger, CCO / Head of E-Commerce
Matthew Kowal / Andy Burger
CCO / Head of E-Commerce
SPONSORED BY The Market Online