Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
PupTentacle

575 Posts.

24

22/05/24

07:22

Post #: 73944708
Share

Originally posted by cowcockie: ↑

Doesn’t matter what it costs if it provides 24/7 power for at least 50 years.
Zero carbon to worry the lovelies.
No wind turbine blades to have to bury after 15 years.
No solar panels to dispose of after 20 years.
No need for massive transmission lines destroying farmland to go ahead. They utilise existing infrastructure.
Snowy will cost 20 billion if it is ever completed. Which I seriously doubt.

Expand

Yes nuclear power, famous for having no waste products that require disposal whatsoever <facepalm>

Last edited by PupTentacle: 22/05/24
11 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

TRS

Don't cry that it's over: The Reject Shop shares to disappear on Wednesday

AII

Almonty Industries shares EXPLODE! Rheinmetall, Renk, and Hensoldt left in the shadows!

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 015 – Yeah, we're thinking the IPO market is back

ENR

Encounter's Aileron recon success 'illustrates how much more still to be found'

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Paradigm funding, Nanoveu drone gains | July 1

First 5 Last

SPONSORED BY