Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-86

First 86 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
cowcockie

7,151 Posts.

21

22/05/24

20:27

Post #: 73962722
Share

Originally posted by givemethecash: ↑

Everyone knows nuclear is the most expensive option (and dangerous) and it leaves governments providing subsidised power to the masses. Yea, nuclear power is a huge burden on the public purse. Otherwise your current non subsidised $300 power bill would be about $900 if general on nuclear. Then you'll wish you listened to reality and reason. Think about it. Renewables solar & wind is the cheapest especially solar (photovoltaic).
If anyone (such as the idiot COALition) try to sell nuclear they don't know what they're talking about and are just promoting the nuclear industry not thinking about the country

Expand

Maybe you should research the price of electricity in Finland and Sweden v’s Germany.
Germany switched to renewables and have very high power prices.
Finland has high tech modern Nuclear reactors and can provide citizens with very cheap electricity.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

BOE

$550 million Jabiluka uranium offer comes unstuck as Government rules lease won't be renewed

AZL

Brine and shine: Arizona Lithium wins early stage eco approval to commence wellpad #2 at Prairie

IVZ

Invictus banks US$5M from Zimbabwean investment fund in support of Cabora Bassa

BIO

Biome unveils three year revenue target up to $85M – but are 3Y targets enough to excite?

PAM

PAM secures high-grade Chilean copper play in strong territory

There are more pages in this discussion • 143 more messages in this thread...

First 86 Last