Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Yes correct, but remember it's not possible to talk logic to a...

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Grant64t

6,057 Posts.

8

24/06/24

21:07

Post #: 74468069
Share

Originally posted by MirCat: ↑

I started a thread that modelling should be based on cost of the life cycle of renewables compared to the life cycle of a nuclear plant!

Guess what, the lobbyist for renewables are avoiding to tackle my questions…. they’re hoping that pro nuclear supporters ignore this valid question!

The life cycle of renewables is estimated to be about 25 years, compared to a nuke plant being between 80 - 100 years..

Even under current pricing the replacement cost of renewables surpasses the end cost of building a nuke plant!

Expand

Yes correct, but remember it's not possible to talk logic to a Socialist ALP/GREENS voter.

They live within a different planet
18 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

Building value through discovery in Mexico’s silver heartland

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

A junior miner unlocking high-grade potential in British Columbia

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY