Had someone else check my financial model that produced a dazzling result.
My intentional conservative total cost of production figure of $30 tonne is considered way too large.
Ive pulled it back to $20 which is more in line with real live data. Capex of $750M was also considered too high but I'm not changing that.
At current Mo prices, year 2 to year 6 net cashflow would be about $A400 million PER ANNUM. My model is based on stripping the high grade core out (55mt @ 0.24%MOS2) and then not caring too much after that.
However, the project like many others is highly sensitive to the Moly price. Slash it from $US33 to $US20 and the net annual cashflow is reduced to about $100M. That's still pretty good loose change.
As you can see there is real substance under this project and which will see corporate deals done (we hope soon).
As for the drilling, I can't see that doing jack for the share price unless they magicly produce bigger grades than RIO but I can't see how.
Nope, for mine, any upward move will be purely corporate deal driven.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- numbers were conservative
RCH
richfield group limited
Had someone else check my financial model that produced a...
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Dr Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Dr Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online