I would say it is different in the sense that he had already lobbied the Chief of Defence on the company's behalf - the defence department made a decision with all due consideration, and Oakeshott is looking to reverse that decision...on behalf of a company who is one of his campaign contributor.
How does that look to you?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- oakegate scandal update #2
oakegate scandal update #2, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online