"the difference is that oakshott apparently tried to get some favours whilst bargaining from a position of prominance in forming a government.
Terry there is nothing legally dubious in stating this. Gillard herself has confirmed as much.
What is dubious is trying to stifle dissent via the threat of legal intimidation. Sticking to the facts is never defamatory.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- oakegate scandal - update
oakegate scandal - update, page-34
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)