"What is dubious is trying to stifle dissent via the threat of legal intimidation. Sticking to the facts is never defamatory."
There is no healty debate here. Only slanderous propositions & suppositions.
I myself think Oakshott chose the wrong side but it doesnt mean I condone the gutter tactics that have occurred since then.
Its extraordinary how much mud has been flung at him since that fateful day.
People of weak character resort to these tactics.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- oakegate scandal - update
"What is dubious is trying to stifle dissent via the threat of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online