Originally posted by born2reign
Maybe they can be in a position to tweet if ACA has already clearly informed them when they are expected to reschedule the episode.
The demands and negative insinuations on here surfaced less than an hour after the ACA episode finished as if OBJ had any say into the TV station's decision and magically had all the answers on how future episodes were going to pan out.
Why would you bother "Tweeting" another update, which may or may not air on the day ACA has specified, to inform ingrates who will only crucify OBJ again if ACA delay it one more time.
This has nothing to do with "the past" or "new management at the helm", there is no link here whatsoever between historic events, previous or new management or any action, decision or control that OBJ has over the segment.
This is ACA's program and we have a < 5 minute slot coming up that most people became aware of < 48 hours ago and yet due to a decision to delay completely out of OBJ's hands, it is being spun off like a negative event and 'same old OBJ, new management, same story' insinuations...
B2R, all I'm saying is if you can announce it via Twitter, you can update it via Twitter. No need to get all worked up and write a book. It's a one minute phone-call to the Producer of the segment and a 30 second tweet. Tweeting seems to be OBJ's new preferred method of Shareholder contact when the ASX won't allow these types of updates. It's simple and represents a step in the right direction away from previous Management BS of burying their heads in the sand and silence. That is my opinion. I respect your opinion. No more alarmist BS terminology from you please. Nobody 'crucified' anybody. Nobody acted like a spoiled brat. Nobody complained. Nobody demanded. These are all your own negative terms. As Shareholders, we all just want to be kept informed. If Twitter is the preferred method, then use it imo.
(20min delay)