Yes, they did miss the point. I'm a process & governance person. A change of editor should not result in a 360 degree shift in a recommendation in a relatively short period of time. That investors may have bought the stock on the recommendation of "buy up to 10c" straight after the capital raising only for ASCI to slap a "sell for 2.4c" several weeks later is unethical and should be not be determined solely by a new editor - there should be a company process to change a recommendation. For all we know, someone at ASCI may have wanted out and pumped up the stock with a buy recommendation, which has cost investors who bought the stock on ASCI's initial buy recommendation. I have not renewed my subscription which expires at the end of the month. I did receive their weekly email and was disgusted at their attempt to justify their sell recommendation. I know ASIC is a toothless tiger but I'm almost tempted to formally complain to them, if nothing else to put the wind up ASCI. They don't deserve to get off lightly.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IVX
- Objective analysis INVION
Objective analysis INVION, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IVX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.33M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.2¢ | $6.251K | 2.967M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
47 | 43316984 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.3¢ | 4352691 | 8 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
47 | 43316984 | 0.002 |
26 | 29577144 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.003 | 4352691 | 8 |
0.004 | 8453485 | 11 |
0.005 | 8422572 | 26 |
0.006 | 2074992 | 8 |
0.007 | 1562000 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
IVX (ASX) Chart |