Raks, The CVI thread post’s came under scrutiny in response to...

Raks,
The CVI thread post’s came under scrutiny in response to numerous complaints from members that certain threads became virtually unreadable. Hence a general warning was given back on 30 November - it was that course of action, or go through and moderate some 40-50 individual post’s (I don’t think so ).

I have no personal interest in CVI, or for that matter know who they are or what they do. The first post in thread (to me) appeared to be a cut/paste from some legitimate legal proceedings document.

Insofar as suspending Kromey1; it is only for a couple of days and meant to be only “slap on the wrist” and a reminder to others. After all, if the post had not been moderated then what message would that give to others?

I take offence at the comments in the first line of Matt85’s post. To suggest I “support” troublemakers is ludicrous and does not merit further comment.

Finally Raks, the mods. operate under guidelines provided by HC management. One such guideline is that a post is only to be removed under extreme circumstances. Rather we are asked to moderate the post and leave same on the thread in order members can better see what is/ is not acceptable in posts.