Oct. 28 9:30 AM AWST JRI live Q&A with Scott, page-71

Good breakdown, just be aware that they misinterpreted the question about residual gas. Scott took it as asking about residual gas in the 200 horizon, but the question was how it was delineated in the 250-300 and whether that supports the 200 interpretation of hydrocarbons. So he thought it was a misinterpretation saying the hydrocarbons wouldn't be commercial in the 200 (that would be the case if they were residual there) but I was almost asking the opposite.. What was their interpretation of residual shows underneath and how does that support the interpretation of HC's above.

But even though the question was whiffed we still got an interesting answer. He basically said they were looking at the possibility of migration laterally above the thick seal in the forest but I'll have to wait for the recording because I was trying to type out that the question was wrong and missed the full answer as to what it was they detected..