If the floods are interchangeable is a good question to be asked of an investor friendly CEO.
As other posters have said the drop in recoverable oil might be offset by the cost reductions, ease of availability and resultant speed to production using chemicals making them six of one economically. If so i'd vote for the speedy option. There are plenty of mature fields to be worked over by a specialist company like elk in the US. Waiting around for co2 for any or each project might be too competitive and def slow.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ELK
- october
october, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)