Ok ... I think get the point of your question ... it's the "down ramping" thing and buying cheap shares - yes?.
Seriously - from some posters (e.g. like the one's that write the "Game Set and Match nonsense") I expect that type of question but I thought you had a better, more mature handle on the issues. Or, are you playing for the cheering crowd momentum?
And if we could - let's continue the religious theme for just one more post - so aside from proverbs 25:2 - it looks your question wants to move us into 'revelations'!
Awesome. I really am having some fun today.
Of course - I will grab cheap shares wherever they turn up. This down ramping thing is truly ridiculous. It is useless crutch for those who are not able to account for the predicament of their own making. A kind of, "... I lost money on that investment because of those horrible down rampers"
Seriously, if there is a poster who believes that absurd and immature theory they ought to move out of shares and into the casino - I think. And if you all believe so resolutely in MM, QBL and the QBL BOD how could a few posts change anything? C'mon at least we could all try and be adults about this.
And how on earth can anyone down ramp a share that is not even trading - seriously - it does make me wonder!
Is it now a crime to take advantage of momentum swings in shares?
FYI - the post that you referred the forum to was a company that I held for quite some time (~4 years). Therefore, I am qualified to comment. Thing is, I can see many parallels between that company and QBL. In all fairness - if you have been researching my posts on another forum you might have at least quoted more than one.
1. You do know the difference between a LT hold and and ST hold - yes?
2. And you are aware of the fact that many traders actually buy and sell shares to make a profit - yes?
3. And you are aware that some traders / investors have a trading parcel and a longer term parcel in the same company - yes?
4. And you are aware that the goal of some traders is to be 'free carried' in spec stocks so as to minimise capital exposure while maintaining a position in a company that might just produce the goods - yes?
Seriously Neil - I thought you had more to offer than the typically mundane, pedestrian and parochial 'let's swing the mood of the crowd' approach.
Some other poster seems to have quoted me as not worrying about holders - of course I don't worry about QBL holders - worry about people you don't know?? Sheesh - the demands placed upon contrarians is becoming very onerous. And shock horror - yes I do enter into ST trades.
However, I always hope that small players and mums and dad investors do not lose their money. On that and many other points I have been entirely consistent.
And by the way - why have you continued to avoid my earlier questions with this nonsensical distraction?
