oh dear, page-59

the companies stringencies should be reflective and within range of normal industry standards. have ivd safety measures too strict and you stand to lose out on a quicker amount of production and efficiency at the more expensive cost of delaying full implementation in conjunction with other companies trying to get ahead of one another.

im just brainstorming here, which is why i asked the question at what point is the amount of testing reasonable for a company to get mix n go onboard.

obviously this has not been answered and all i have got is ask the companies yourself kind of opinion..

i mean geoff did state last year was meant to be the start of a few commercial deals, dont quote me exact on that, hence he thought the tests were reasonably amounted to some sort of adequacy.. anyone care to expand?