ok shoot this down

I wrote this on the Seeking Alpha board under the tag Silly34.
What a text book decision SHC is.
Yes might go wrong but certainly stacks up well.
Please shoot it down if you can.

can't see its vague as far as C_Pulse is concerned.
Is there a need for incredible detail re. previous invention for investment decision?
C_Pulse Classic, Classic investment.
1. Old proven technology used in a new way.
2. Inventors have form.
3. No competitors
4. Attracting quality management.
5. FDA supportive.
6. Got cash to complete.
7. Blue Sky prospects.
8. Cash for product. ( Not relying on advertising revenue like twitter)
9. Clear path to commercialisation, expected February 2014.
10. Safety/Efficacy demonstrated.
11. Low burden on patient.(turn off/on)
12. Fully implantable in development. In humans 2014
13. Coolhand as long as you are not a short, you appear to have timed your investment to classic "Railway principles" coming in on the 4th or 5th capital raising?
14. Time Drift is tightening up. Expecting upswing in implants Feb 2014 in Europe as more implant ready sites continue trial.

Only vague bits I know are:
1. How enrolment is going in US. But some heavy hitters from the "ssh corporate jet dorm" have been hired and put on the case.
2. Is the uncorrected $320 from Summer Street correct?
3. How low will the shorts on the yahoo board go, saw one using Robert_Honeywill as a tag. About as low, silly and as unethical as you can get I would think, unless you were more sophisticated and mixed furphys in with the truth to destabilise the market?

Nothings for certain, but what else would you consider for a speculative investment decision? Less vague than a lot of Blue Chips ( they can be risky too).
DYOR.

could add 15. Only needs tiny market penetration to be hugely profitable.