Ok , with all info out I say NO, page-10

When a deal is unfair to one party, (OBJ holders), it follows that the other party to the agreement is gaining a disproportionate benefit.

The two parties to an unfair deal can be henceforth be accurately described as 'the big loser' and 'the big winner', respectively.

The 'big winner' is cashing out a business arguably past its peak and acquiring effective control of a company with its peak ahead of it. The new business is generously hocking itself to the eyeballs to pay him off, giving him effective control of the company via a bit less than half its issued shares, a Directorship, and operating capital for his new company.

The 'big loser' is giving up their company and its future to the big winner, dirt cheap.