When a deal is unfair to one party, (OBJ holders), it follows that the other party to the agreement is gaining a disproportionate benefit.
The two parties to an unfair deal can be henceforth be accurately described as 'the big loser' and 'the big winner', respectively.
The 'big winner' is cashing out a business arguably past its peak and acquiring effective control of a company with its peak ahead of it. The new business is generously hocking itself to the eyeballs to pay him off, giving him effective control of the company via a bit less than half its issued shares, a Directorship, and operating capital for his new company.
The 'big loser' is giving up their company and its future to the big winner, dirt cheap.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ok , with all info out I say NO
When a deal is unfair to one party, (OBJ holders), it follows...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 132 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable