Hi Cmk, your really confusing me, one minute your wanting blood,...

Hi Cmk, your really confusing me, one minute your wanting blood, next your happy. I'll give you a hint why the leaked Adelaide photo caused a stir and the The Oz article didn't,..... one was authorised by P&G, the other wasn't, and it was a much more detailed photo BTW.

But thanks for bringing new food for thought to the table, and Jase as well.

I would love for the BOD to reveal all and I'm sure they would love to tell us, they all own shares as well, but it won't happen until others say yes first. Agreed some of the terminology seems confusing- this may be intentional or sloppy or part both, doubt we will ever know for sure.

Unlike other theories I believe the Oz story does point to promising things to come, and the big list of new trademarks does as well. Those potential new products in the leaked photo were not toys, things are taking shape nicely.

Just saw, Oggy's post, Hmmmmm.

GLTA Cheers Steve