""(Why should I believe your unsubstantiated claims that you have unnamed sources who have made unsubstantiated claims that they know unverifiable information about ND's agreements?)""
Karll,
Incorrect, totally incorrect 100%.
I believe that you should read that post of mine once more and then answer my questions.
-----
Buddy, I did indeed read your post:
"I have done some research if that funding was okay and guess what, I was told that its all baloney and pies in the skies.
Now I can't divulge as to where I managed to get that info from, but I have challenged CB on several occasion to email me (NO, not in Hot Copper but in private), telling me where that money was coming from and that I would have told him as to why it total BS.....But guess what..............NO REPLAYS..."
--- Firstly, your comments about your research are unsubstantiated - I am not saying they are untrue. I am saying that there is no evidence provided with them. It is purely your word. And that is what unsubstantiated means - not substantiated by any form of evidence.
Secondly, I said that your claims came from an unnamed source - that is because you said "Now I can't divulge as to where I managed to get that info from" - you refuse to name it, there for it is unnamed.
Thirdly, I said that the claims reportedly made by your unnamed source are unsubstantiated - again, you have not provided any further details to support your source's claims of the validity of their statements, nor their origins or any such details - hence the claims you allege were made by your unnamed source are unsubstantiated.
Fourth I said that this source is (allegedly) providing unverifiable information. That is again a fact - you have not provided any indication whatsoever that it verifiable or has been verified by any other person.
I stand by my statement.
As for what CB has not responded to you, perhaps he has made use of the block feature of Hotcopper, as I am doing right now?
Regards, and farewell - I've had enough of these circular discussions with you.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTP
- Old Direction Fanciful Finance
Old Direction Fanciful Finance, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
4.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(2.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $36.26M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
5.0¢ | 5.0¢ | 4.9¢ | $13.5K | 270.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 199992 | 4.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.0¢ | 46448 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 903329 | 0.048 |
1 | 200000 | 0.047 |
1 | 100000 | 0.046 |
1 | 60000 | 0.045 |
4 | 370418 | 0.041 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.050 | 46448 | 1 |
0.055 | 16663 | 1 |
0.058 | 172431 | 1 |
0.059 | 25000 | 1 |
0.060 | 210909 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CTP (ASX) Chart |