The not so subtle beauty between how OM and ISS went about their report should not be lost.
OM a fledgling local in the governance field.
- fielded speculation from unknown sources.
- drew conclusion without consulting the ISX management team.
- released their report to institutional fund managers and other unknown entities.
- report leaks to shorters and used to capitulate the share price.
- ISX do not pay for the report.
ISS the global kingpin in the governance field.
- prepared a proforma statement of ISX business based on 100 criteria, including governance.
- contacted the ISX management team for review, contributions, substantiation for justification.
- release their report to institutional fund managers.
- ISX do not pay for the report.
ISS are a professional and highly regarded global player with signficant history, depth and integrity in this specialised field. Which organisation should the investing public have more faith in?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- OM vs ISS
OM vs ISS
- There are more pages in this discussion • 106 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)