Thanks Molinski,I am a pretty simple person and I supose my...

Thanks Molinski,

I am a pretty simple person and I supose my point is this.

If you walk into a shop, any shop and ask for 2 products that are interrelated in how they work, maybe a toy with batteries made by the same company.

Whe nyou get home and either the toy or the batteries dont work, surely you have the right to take both items back and say thanks, this is stuffed, I dont want it.

My simplitistic analogy applies to 2008 trees and loans. Surely, if walking into the Great Southern "shop" and asking for trees and a loan to fund them is the same.

If the trees are not planted, then surely, surely an investor has the right to take both products back and say "thanks these are stuffed - they never did work - and give them BOTH back".

Surely, what GSF did with that loan i.e. in on selling it to whomever - IS THEIR PROBLEM because it never worked in the first place.