See Slyvestor's explanation above - doesn't usually look at any new evidence - it's an appeal that Tracey J didn't follow the law correctly in his determination.
The appeal is to cause maximum harm to VMS, shareholders and local families who want work plus it's so STT/TNC like they are doing something so people keep funding them. Capacity to pay for any costs to be awarded is key, so if they are down to $0 they would need quick funding to show that their appeal can even be granted.
Plain and simple.
See Slyvestor's explanation above - doesn't usually look at any...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $40.06M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.5¢ | 1.5¢ | 1.4¢ | $7.824K | 526.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 2638111 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 2549206 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.32pm 30/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VMS (ASX) Chart |