"Heres my take on matters H/Q knew what was in the ground and then applied for an extension".
What did they know was in the ground?, uranium? 10mlb, 30mlb, 70mlb? I would guess their data indicated a high probability of a significant find. Subsequent drilling after the extension confirmed this.
"At the last agm the Lawyer representing AGS virtually said the same ie. either 100% or status quo will be the outcome."
This makes no sense to me but if true I would pick status quo ahead of 100%
" In one of my conversations with AGS's Management I put it to them what would be, if the Court handed down a decision and the J/V stayed as is (25%)?
At the time the reply, briefly was, It wont be the end of it"
I would interpret that as they wouldnt tolerate remaining in a 25% JV with Heathgate.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- only 2 outcomes
only 2 outcomes, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online