Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Do you mean that SFRs had to invest in high risk bank stocks...

First 14 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
4sighttrader

3,757 Posts.

508

01/07/24

22:48

Post #: 74557092
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag ↑

self-funded retirees (SFR) struggled hard under the Libs as the RBA was forced to lower interest rates due to the weakness of the Aus economy. this meant that many SFRs had to reinvest their money into higher risk strategies as their interest rate payments dried up to zero.

I didn't read anyone complaining much, except th SFRs.....

Expand

Do you mean that SFRs had to invest in high risk bank stocks paying a measly 6/7% fully franked dividends to beat the paltry interest rates on offer?

Terrible just terrible hey?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

COD

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

ESR

Estrella first foreign entity to win tenements in Timor-Leste under new laws ahead of 2025 tenders

KAL

KalGold rolls out detailed aeromagnetic survey across Pinjin project

Week 39 Wrap: What HotCopper’s watching; China’s new stimmy moves boost metals; Oz CPI drop

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

NAM

ACCC seeks Olam divestments before it can buy Namoi Cotton

STK

5.6g/t gold intercept at Serbia's Rogozna supports Strickland's hopes for high-grade core

DEG

HotCopper users muse on De Grey's denial of Agnico Eagle takeover bid – but who are Agnico?

The market's shrugged at China's stimulus measures all year. Why is this one different?

The winners & losers on market if negative gearing were gone

There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...

First 14 Last