Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Do you mean that SFRs had to invest in high risk bank stocks...

First 14 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
4sighttrader

3,633 Posts.

496

01/07/24

22:48

Post #: 74557092
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag ↑

self-funded retirees (SFR) struggled hard under the Libs as the RBA was forced to lower interest rates due to the weakness of the Aus economy. this meant that many SFRs had to reinvest their money into higher risk strategies as their interest rate payments dried up to zero.

I didn't read anyone complaining much, except th SFRs.....

Expand

Do you mean that SFRs had to invest in high risk bank stocks paying a measly 6/7% fully franked dividends to beat the paltry interest rates on offer?

Terrible just terrible hey?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

PEC

Continuous high-grade REEs of up to 6,327 ppm bode well for Perpetual's Brazilian footprint

STM

Sunstone hits gold and silver in "new areas" at Limon, Ecuador, ahead of MRE for project

EMC

Everest Metals inks first resource at Mt Edon for nearly 8,000 tonnes with prices at US$1,000+/kg

The Rising Tide: How institutional adoption is shaping the future of crypto

CC9

Chariot locks in high-potential drill target at Black Mountain, one of the USA's largest lithium landholdings

There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...

First 14 Last

SPONSORED BY