OEC orbital corporation limited

Date of lodgement: 03-May-2005Title: Open Briefing®. Orbital...

  1. 6,931 Posts.
    Date of lodgement: 03-May-2005
    Title: Open Briefing®. Orbital Corp. CEO on Update
    Record of interview:
    corporatefile.com.au
    Orbital Corporation Limited said recently in presentations to investors that it’s
    seeing increased interest in four-stroke engine applications for Orbital Combustion
    Process (OCP), its air-assisted, direct fuel injection system. What’s driving this
    interest and what are the typical processes you go through before “interest”
    translates into earnings for the company?
    CEO Peter Cook
    The increased interest we’ve observed in four-stroke applications of OCP is
    publicly visible in technical papers presented at the recent Society of Automotive
    Engineers (SAE) World Congress, the SAE’s Small Engine Technology
    Conference and the Japanese Society of Automotive Engineers’ Spring Congress.
    It’s also visible in recent patent applications for technologies in which central airassisted
    direct injection is an integral part. Clearly what’s driving the interest is
    forecast changes in market conditions, where Original Equipment Manufacturers
    (OEMs) see emission and fuel economy issues becoming critical to the end
    consumer.
    The interest translates fairly quickly into earnings for us because we tend to
    participate in all stages of the technology adoption process, from working with our
    clients at the development level, through our Powertrain Engineering Services
    (PES) business, through to receiving longer-term royalties from the application of
    our technology in the final product in consumers’ hands.
    corporatefile.com.au
    High-pressure direct injection systems, which also reduce emissions, are available
    but have had limited success. Why? How does OCP differ from these systems?
    CEO Peter Cook
    High-pressure DI systems offer little improvement in toxic emissions, specifically
    NOx, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons, and provide only limited improvement
    in fuel economy and CO2 emissions. They don’t offer enough incentive, versus
    their cost, to have been widely adopted.
    Some of the recent technical papers I mentioned demonstrate that OCP improves
    fuel economy and reduces carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions whilst
    retaining the CO2 benefit of high-pressure DI. All at a comparable cost. In simple
    terms, OCP allows better fuel preparation at the injector, producing a finer, better
    dispersed and controlled spray. That’s our patented know-how.
    corporatefile.com.au
    You’ve highlighted that a combination of mechanical features such as variable
    valve timing, downsizing and turbo charging, plus advanced combustion control
    using direct injection will lead to significant benefits in fuel efficiency and
    emission reduction without high investment in infrastructure. Why has this type of
    combination not been introduced?
    CEO Peter Cook
    These technologies have been available for a number of years so the only
    conclusion you can come to is that consumers have been reluctant to pay the added
    cost of emission and fuel-economy improving technologies. The major change we
    sense is in consumer sentiment. Consumers are starting to become concerned
    about higher fuel prices and global warming as issues. SUV sales in North
    America for example seem to have plateaued. Manufacturers such as Toyota that
    have introduced fuel-economy market entries seem to have met a latent market
    need. We see the change in sentiment continuing. If it does, manufacturers of
    internal combustion engines will need to improve CO2 emissions and reduce fuel
    consumption, plus continue to deliver power over the full operational range of the
    engine.
    If a combination of technologies is applied properly to reduce emissions and
    improve fuel efficiency, the consumer would be prepared to pay for it. Consumers
    did so with diesel engines, and we forecast a similar revolution with gasoline
    engines over the next few years. Whereas diesel has particular problems with
    emissions, both toxic and particulate, that aren’t cost effectively solvable, the cost
    and technologies are known for gasoline emission control.
    All of these available technologies will play a part in a low-emission, fuel-efficient
    gasoline engine. However, we believe its central feature will be improved fuel
    preparation at the injector, with improved combustion control. This is an area
    we’ve pioneered, and our intellectual property is extensive and solid.
    corporatefile.com.au
    Synerject, your 50:50 joint venture with Siemens-VDO Automotive has become
    the major driver of earnings in recent periods, accounting for most of Orbital’s
    EBIT in the full year to June 2004. Can you comment on Synerject’s recent
    performance and the outlook for the current second half?
    CEO Peter Cook
    First, I’d point out that we did enjoy license and royalty income in the six months
    to December almost identical to Synerject’s contribution. And last year we saw a
    similar contribution from our PES business to that of Synerject. Synerject’s two major customers, Mercury Marine and Rotax are both growing
    and we expect the business to meet or exceed our budget forecasts. Synerject is
    looking at ways of increasing its presence in the Asian markets and is starting to
    invest in second-generation products to meet anticipated price points and its own
    growth targets. Additionally it’s addressing quality and delivery aspects of its
    performance to make certain it always meets all its customer expectations. At this
    stage we expect Synerject to deliver its budgeted EBIT.
    corporatefile.com.au
    To what extent will Synerject’s future growth depend on the growth of major
    customers such as Rotax and Mercury? What potential is there to expand
    Synerject’s client base?
    CEO Peter Cook
    Synerject has a wide range of customers. It continues to expand its client base and win new programmes. Also as I’ve indicated, its two major customers continue to grow. Synerject’s potential is driven by the conversion of carburetted nonautomotive engines to electronic management systems. Whilst this conversion is all but complete in cars and trucks, there’s a considerable market in two wheelers, in marine, recreational, light industrial engines and light industrial vehicles yet to convert. Synerject’s specifically geared to this market and is the only specialist company servicing the market.
    corporatefile.com.au
    What’s the growth outlook for Synerject?
    CEO Peter Cook
    Synerject’s addressing the growth markets of Asia, updating its product range and
    refining its quality and service. Its key customers are also expecting growth. That
    all looks promising for revenue growth in future years.
    corporatefile.com.au
    Orbital made a net loss of $1.5 million in the recent first half ended December
    2004. Can you provide an update on the outlook for the current full year?
    CEO Peter Cook
    Despite the volatility in market conditions we expect the second half to be
    appreciably better than the first, although unfortunately we’re unlikely to see a
    profitable year overall. The earlier advice we gave the market was that we
    expected to deliver a positive NPAT in the second half, and that remains our
    forecast. As always, foreign exchange movements could have an adverse
    influence on the final reported result.
    corporatefile.com.au
    What guidance can you provide regarding the earnings outlook for the 2006
    financial year?
    CEO Peter Cook
    We see upside for each of our business sectors in fiscal 2006. We have a licensee,
    in Bajaj, due on stream in the middle of fiscal 2006 and we’re led to believe
    Mercury Marine’s expecting growth in Optimax volumes as well. I’ve already
    indicated our prospects in PES are as strong as they’ve ever been, although I stress
    they’re not firm orders, and that the outlook for Synerject is positive. With
    continued control of costs and appropriate R&D spending, we’re looking at fiscal
    2006 in a positive light.
    corporatefile.com.au
    Thank you Peter.
    For more information about Orbital, please visit www.orbitalcorp.com.au or call
    Peter Cook on (+61 8) 9441 2311
    For previous Open Briefings by Orbital, or to receive future Open Briefings by email,
    please visit www.corporatefile.com.au
    DISCLAIMER: Corporate File Pty Ltd has taken reasonable care in publishing the information contained in this Open Briefing. It is
    information given in a summary form and does not purport to be complete. The information contained is not intended to be used as the basis
    for making any investment decision and you are solely responsible for any use you choose to make of the information. We strongly advise
    that you seek independent professional advice before making any investment decisions. Corporate File Pty Ltd is not responsible for any
    consequences of the use you make of the information, including any loss or damage you or a third party might suffer as a result of that use.

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
20.5¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $36.70M
Open High Low Value Volume
21.0¢ 22.0¢ 20.5¢ $122.8K 584.8K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 49997 20.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
21.5¢ 26389 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 12/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
OEC (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.