Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

WFL wellfully limited

0.00%

0.3¢

Open Letter to Dyamond, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
gallea

2,629 Posts.

308

05/11/22

11:56

Post #: 64604660
Share

Originally posted by gallea: ↑

OPEN LETTER TO DYAMOND

Dear Dyamond,

It would appear that you are lurking and eavesdropping in the hope of curating and improving sentiment on social media in the hoped of getting a fat lump sum if you can get the SP up to 2.7 cents. However, your appointment is the last in a long line of shenanigans. I would like you to give me good reason why I should not file complaints about the conduct of WFL to ASIC and the ASX.

I would like to share and compare our experiences. You have been engaged because "Wellfully anticipates that turning around sentiment on social and business media forums could have a positive impact on the Company". But at what expense and dilution to existing shareholders? It seems like the last despairing roll of the dice by totally inept management who have tried to act like a grand multinational behemoth when they have close to zero fund in the bank. My experience is that I have 500,000 shares purchased over time, which cost me $140,000. The notion that you get 10 times that number, simply for signing on to attempt to paint lipstick on the pig, really sticks in my craw. And another 5 million shares for getting the SP up to 2.7 cents by the end of the month, and it doesn't even say how long for! Just wow! And a further 10 million options to buy at 2.2 cents. Just amazingly generous, and for what?????

Here is my experience. I partook of a CR earlier this year, and "invested" $15,000 at 5 cents. Not a loan to the company. Just throwing good money after bad as it happened. NO ATTACHING OPTIONS. Lucky if I can get back $6,000. Now let's compare my experience with that of the directors, who also helped provide the company with funding shortly after.

The directors LENT money to the company, charging establishment fees, high and increasing interest rates over time, and got their money back. Paul Peos wants shares AND OPTIONS instead of payment of his loan, I believe. But whereas I paid 5 cents a share with no options, PP got interest on his loan, and converts his loan plus interest into shares at just 2.2 cents with FREE ATTACHING OPTIONS exercisable at 3.3 cents. Please correct me if I have misunderstood anything and portrayed it incorrectly.

Note also that the attempt to grab free options as part of the repayment is NOT EVEN MENTIONED in this recent announcement"

"The loans noted under items a) and c) were subsequently repaid in October 2022. The
loan noted under b) from Mr Peros is being converted into ordinary shares subject to
shareholder approval at the 25 November 2022 Annual General Meeting (being part of
Resolution 6)."

As far as I am concerned, in my opinion and in the opinion of many others, this company is not being run in the interests of shareholders. It has been run by smoke and mirrors for far too long. The ethics of the directors are simply shocking. As stated, please give me good reasons why I should not express my concerns that the company is not being run in shareholders' interests to the ASX and ASIC.

I wish I didn't have to spend my Saturday morning this way. I invite you to try and improve my sentiment. Perhaps you might convey to SS and PP just how monumentally ripped off and angry Shareholders are, having invested in a company with exciting technology which promised so much but has delivered so little and is now at $0.001 before consolidation, down from above 10 cents in 2014, a share price decrease of 99 percent.

Yours sincerely
Arthur Galletly

Expand

Dear Dyamond,

Sorry, I forgot, as you are a recent arrival at the Wellfully circus, you may have missed some important bits.

By now were supposed to have FIVE companies, with an MC of $100 million each. The current Market Cap is about 2 percent of those expectations.

We now claim to be vertical and global, IP generators, manufacturers, distributors, have contracts with chains of stores, 1,000 scientists and influencers clamouring to promote our product, but the management of the finances has been way, way worse than useless. It has been negligent and utterly irresponsible..

Our REVENUE for the last quarter? $140,000.
I must be missing something here. Actually, I know what I am missing. The exact same $140,000 I invested in the company!

On behalf of the one cohort of people who actually PAID for their options, options to buy at 15 cents, which expire next year, namely shareholders, can I suggest you put it to the board that these shareholders are also given two free options exercisable at 3.3 cents?
Seems only fair, since low ball options are currently being gifted to all and sundry, it seems.

Sincerely

WFL Price at posting: 2.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
54 Upvote

15 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

RML

Resolution Minerals appoints industry experts to fast-track US growth strategy

CIA

'Share long-term visions': Champion Iron rallies on mooted Nippon, Sojitz partnership

FBU

Fletcher Building 'exploring options' around construction division sale

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

ASX Market Close: How a megadam in Tibet pushed us into the red

First 2 Last

Add to My Watchlist

What is My Watchlist?

A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.