Another erroneous conclusion full of weak logic propositions.The...

Another erroneous conclusion full of weak logic propositions.

The case was not heard, so no conclusion can be drawn on the merits of the claim or not.

The basis of ending it, is founded on the fact the board concluded the case would be significantly prolonged and suck up HR and capital resources and distract the board and executive team from leveraging the opportunity in EUR and NA/SA.

Simple pragmatic board level thinking within the a legal context which in no way is atypical.

Waste of time these past few years - definitely. But your narrative is pure supposition, without evidence to support its conclusion.

Thank you friend.