Where in this statement does it even imply "everyone should be supported?"
whereu it didn't answer the question, so i ask another one,
In my view it did answer the question using different words to the ones that I used. I respect your opinion that the question was not answered.
all i'm saying is, take away a creator and there is absolutely no obligation to do anything for anyone else but yourself.
Again I respect your opinion, I just see it differently. As I see it I have an obligation to my fellow human beings. I don't need a creator to give me a sense of obligation.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- open system theory applied to evolution.
open system theory applied to evolution., page-256
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some