Where in this statement does it even imply "everyone should be supported?"
whereu it didn't answer the question, so i ask another one,
In my view it did answer the question using different words to the ones that I used. I respect your opinion that the question was not answered.
all i'm saying is, take away a creator and there is absolutely no obligation to do anything for anyone else but yourself.
Again I respect your opinion, I just see it differently. As I see it I have an obligation to my fellow human beings. I don't need a creator to give me a sense of obligation.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- open system theory applied to evolution.
Where in this statement does it even imply "everyone should be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online