What would come into play would be questions 1.3.2 1.3.4 in the...

What would come into play would be questions 1.3.2 1.3.4 in the recent judgement of netting off.

You will see that M&D conduct of OP was opened up for proof of claims in that judgement as well as from FH in their submissions. Basically it looks like you can have a proof of claim that may not be netted off on the 15th Oct if you can prove M&D conduct on the part of OP. My guess is that the 27th could possibly be used for proof of claims if you can prove that you relied on the misleading material from OP in making your investment and thought it was a mrgin loan. Most of us abandoned an AMSLA from the start of the transaction.

The judge asked FH to look for further directions in that case moving foward of M&D conduct for clients in OP.

Beeconwood will prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the conduct of OP was both deceptive and misleading.