I am not retracting anything Starburst. This is not the...

  1. 20,020 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 870
    I am not retracting anything Starburst. This is not the Parliament and there is no Hansard record, LOL. I do not know what the ratio of contributions to global warming from 1850 onwards between natural forces and AGW forces was, sorry, but then again I am not a climate scientist and I only know enough to be dangerous. And as I have said before I defer to the recognised authority on these matters and like it or hate it, the authority that I recognise is the warts and all IPCC. The only problem I have with the IPCC is they are a little conservative in their softly, softly language, IMHO.

    Re: "What is the reason suggested by AGW believers for all previous moves in global temperature"... well surely it was visiting aliens? Isn't that obvious? What do you guys really think that AGW proponents think?

    Rod, as Sierra has pointed out, I don't believe that is a credible chart. There are no units on the Y axis! Why not? Because it is a scam. That's right, S C A M.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.