Blogs have their place Hanrahan. If I had more time I would read loads of them, especially people like George Monbiot and RealClimate. I guess at the end of the day they represent both sides of the argument. The only issue is that on the AGW side there is the weight of virtually all peer reviewed journals, the IPCC, plus many credible and venerated institutions like NASA, the Royal Society, the Academy of Sciences, the CSIRO and on and on; versus some shady think tanks and some bloggers.
I will also say again, that chart above is a disgrace and really does sum up how flimsy the whole denialist argument is.
