I wonder if someone like Malaga, Sector or Acorn could help explain to me why there was a need for the Govt. to impliment a NRAS/program for affordable rental if Neg Gearing works to increase/meet demand new affordable rental dwellings..the answer to me seems obvious it either did little, or very little.
For me the NRAS was a patch for a hole in the bucket that the property industry lobby groups said they could cover by pouring sand into the bottom of the bucket..
Here is one reason i think Neg Gearing can be bad for supply..
Negative gearing helps to make it hard for or disadvantages a certain type of investor..the new mid and long-termers looking for positive cash flow from residential or the established ones looking to expand their portfolio..
and because new supply prices are pushed up as a result of increased speculative price rises the return needed to make a reasonable level of neg income instead of an overly large neg income is likely to lead to investors asking/seeking ever higher rents anyway so either way rents will usually track prices, and if it doesnt it eventually will..
- Forums
- Property
- overwhelming support to axe negative gearing
overwhelming support to axe negative gearing, page-141
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 97 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online