no doubt the pressure is on STO.
They do run the risk of paying a very high multiple only because the sector is hot again, the sector has been de-risked in the last 3 weeks, and the scramble is on again.
Also, STO would probably be more aware of the potential resource being developed by ESG and what may look like a high price to you and I, may in fact be reasonable based upon their info.
Throw in the strategic importance of Gunnedah to STO - just look at their recent presentations, and, as we said all along, the economics are far better building 3 or 4 trains than 1 or 2.
ESG is possibly the last, more advanced, CSG companies with a strong and growing resource. The others are either smaller, with lower future potential, or just too far away from a meaningful compliant resource.
Given these factors and STO's history, you can bet that they will fight tooth and nail to get ESG. And they will be made to pay. 1 for 6 sounds like a dream, however, funnier things have happened, particularly as ESG will surely be rolling out increases is reserves. Each increase will justify STO's decision to pay $2.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ESG
- p 26 fin review - possible bidding war for esg
p 26 fin review - possible bidding war for esg, page-17
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ESG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online